← Mint a Brand

Answer

Can I relaunch a coin that failed?

Short answer

Yes, at the same 0.01495 SOL measured cost — but a relaunch is a new mint with new addresses, and the old coin stays on chain holding the name and ticker you already used.

A wooden mallet and scattered iron nails on dark slate.
Checked 2026-10-31. Every figure here is either measured by us or read from the primary source listed at the bottom of the page.

A new mint is a new coin

Nothing prevents you from creating another coin. It costs the same measured 0.01495 SOL — 0.0144428 SOL of refundable deposits and 0.00051 SOL of network fee — and takes the same minute. What it does not do is continue the old one. New mint address, new curve, new token accounts, new chart. Anyone holding the first coin still holds the first coin.

That is the part people get wrong when they talk about relaunching. There is no migration of holders, no shared history, and no way to make the second coin the same asset as the first.

  • Same cost as any launch: 0.01495 SOL measured.
  • New mint, new curve, new token accounts, separate chart.
  • Holders of the first coin are not holders of the second.

The name and ticker are already spent

Name, ticker and image are immutable at creation and the authorities are null, so the old coin keeps them forever. You can reuse the same ticker on a new mint, but two coins will then exist with the same name, one of them dead, and search will show both. Similar tickers from strangers are common too.

The practical consequence is that a relaunch cannot inherit trust. Anything you say about the second coin has to stand on its own, because a reader who looks up the ticker sees the earlier attempt first.

  • Metadata is fixed at creation and cannot be edited afterwards.
  • Reusing the ticker leaves two coins with the same name in search.
  • Trust does not transfer between mints.

How to do it without misleading anyone

Say plainly that this is a second attempt, and what changed. Do not imply continuity, do not call it a migration, and do not describe the earlier coin as though it were a pre-launch. If people from the first attempt are still around, tell them directly rather than letting them find out from a chart.

Then treat the relaunch with the same expectations as any launch: 0.198% of coins graduated in the May to June 2026 sample, and a second attempt does not shift that base rate by itself. Relaunching is cheap; being believed twice is not.

  • State that it is a new coin, in the first line, in plain words.
  • Do not use migration language for something that is not a migration.
  • Budget for the same odds as a first launch.

Related questions

Can I use the same ticker again?

Yes, a new mint can carry the same ticker, but the old coin keeps its own metadata permanently, so two coins with that name will exist.

Can I move the old holders across?

Not as part of the launch. Any transfer would be a separate arrangement you make yourself, and it is not something the launch does for you.

Does a relaunch cost more than the first one?

No. The measured CreateV2 cost was 0.01495 SOL, made up of 0.0144428 SOL of deposits and 0.00051 SOL of network fee.

Where to go next

If the brand and the page are what is stopping you

Mint a Brand draws the icon, banner and stickers, builds the token site on its own subdomain and prepares the launch for your wallet to sign, for $30. Your wallet pays the network fee and is the creator of record.

Start a launch   What a launch costs

Sources

  1. pump.fun create coin documentation
  2. pump.fun public docs repository
  3. Solana fee structure

Checked 2026-10-31 · nothing here is financial advice, and most meme coins go to zero.

← All answers